Karl Marx and our time

I have learnt to Karl Marx (1883), I you want to become socialist philosopher. First read natural sciences or any branch of natural science and try to understand what science is? Then go to understand history of philosophy and try to understand what philosophy is? And then go to history and try to understand what kind of relations with present and past. If you would able to answer of all these question then you would be able to answer this question what is relation present with future.

I read some essay on science and find out there are two form of knowledge. Contemporary knowledge and scientific knowledge. The ancient philosopher even today philosopher knows on form of knowledge. If knows, then why Marx said, ‘I am not a Marxist’.

I collect some book of history of philosophy and make my opinion. Philosopher can explain the world. Philosopher can not lead the political or social revolution. Only founder of Islam is exception in history of philosophy. After Buddha the first Buddhist state come to existence 300 years. After Jesus, first christen state come to existence 250 years later. And Marx, first socialist state comes to existence 35 years. Neither any philosopher changed the world.

I go to history and agree to Marx the basic quality of society is a labor division of labor and diversification of labor is essence of social realty. I don’t agree of theory of class dictatorship with Karl Marx. I find out another process of socialism. What is? Suppose it the basic quality of society and social movement is diversification of labor. A much as labor diversified the social structure would be complicated. As much as society would be complicated the scholar are becoming part of state to manage the society. This process led the Democratic and Socialist state. The other basic qualities of society are sex and literature. And work of earlier to Marx thinker based on sex. And woks of Karl Marx based on labor and general philosophy is leading by literature not science.

What is difference in past and present? Our ancient scholar was influenced by nature and we are leading by natural sciences.

Thanks for reading my words and happy to read your side. What is your opinion?