FUNDAMENTAL OF SOCIALISM

In fifteen century, British economist found the one of basic quality of society. Which called labour and estasblished a fact, “all kind of social assets have produced by collective labor”? Later this fact became fundamental of theory of socialism.

In nineteen century, Karl Marx found a contradiction of capitalism, “collective form of labor and individual form of profit, in industry,” and supposed unite of labor class will resolved this contradiction by socialist state.

Now we have history of nine decades of socialism in Russia, China and some other countries. Theory of Karl Marx “dictatorship of labor” proved wrong. An interesting come from history of socialist country what would be remained after demolition of class. Russian and chines text tells us people or working people would be remained.
It means struggle would be continue with in state and society and this struggle not ended by communism as Marx announced.

What I know about socialism. Socialism is a one imagination of humankind. Imagination of problem free society. And imagination comes from religious philosophy of uniform society. Today communal tensions or terror became a serious world problem. And we are witness the American way to solve this problem is not a good way.

I would be happened. I think it depend on our mental status how someone is investigation present past relation. The question of present future relation is second question.

What we obtained to history about socialism. An imagination and some perceptions.
Imagination is of problem free societies and perceptions are:
1) Because natural resources are gifted to human kind so every one have equal right upon nature.
2) Because all kinds of social assets are produced by collective labor so profit will be distributed in within in member those produce the profit.
3) Because man and woman are two forms of human kind so both have equal rights and duties.
4) The kids are part of future generation so they fed up and educated without any kind of discrimination.
5) All man of country would be granted by state for safe living, education, health and employment and every thing which become common in society.

Karl Marx supposed in nineteen centuries capitalism would be replaced by socialism. But Marx failed to understand the process of socialism. Now I want to present my hypothesis. How socialism would be developed. Suppose it the basic quality of social development of labor or labor power or division of labor. Not power of sex as we are thinking in literary way and obtained text from history.
My hypothesis is: as much as lob our diversified society would be complicate in her structure. As much as society would be complicated the professional thinkers would be a need of state to manage the society. As much as scholars involved with state to manage the society a new form of state would be developed. And this form of state would be called socialist state. But I don’t think ever society would be called socialist society. Because society is not an organization. What is society? Society is a total of organization which based on sex, function on theory of division of labor and law of representative. Society is not an organization.

Therefore we can struggle for democratic socialist state only. We can not make problem free society or classless or stateless society: as our forefather was thinking.

Thanks for reading my words.