Karl Marx and our time

I have learnt to Karl Marx (1883), I you want to become socialist philosopher. First read natural sciences or any branch of natural science and try to understand what science is? Then go to understand history of philosophy and try to understand what philosophy is? And then go to history and try to understand what kind of relations with present and past. If you would able to answer of all these question then you would be able to answer this question what is relation present with future.

I read some essay on science and find out there are two form of knowledge. Contemporary knowledge and scientific knowledge. The ancient philosopher even today philosopher knows on form of knowledge. If knows, then why Marx said, ‘I am not a Marxist’.

I collect some book of history of philosophy and make my opinion. Philosopher can explain the world. Philosopher can not lead the political or social revolution. Only founder of Islam is exception in history of philosophy. After Buddha the first Buddhist state come to existence 300 years. After Jesus, first christen state come to existence 250 years later. And Marx, first socialist state comes to existence 35 years. Neither any philosopher changed the world.

I go to history and agree to Marx the basic quality of society is a labor division of labor and diversification of labor is essence of social realty. I don’t agree of theory of class dictatorship with Karl Marx. I find out another process of socialism. What is? Suppose it the basic quality of society and social movement is diversification of labor. A much as labor diversified the social structure would be complicated. As much as society would be complicated the scholar are becoming part of state to manage the society. This process led the Democratic and Socialist state. The other basic qualities of society are sex and literature. And work of earlier to Marx thinker based on sex. And woks of Karl Marx based on labor and general philosophy is leading by literature not science.

What is difference in past and present? Our ancient scholar was influenced by nature and we are leading by natural sciences.

Thanks for reading my words and happy to read your side. What is your opinion?

FUNDAMENTAL OF SOCIALISM

In fifteen century, British economist found the one of basic quality of society. Which called labour and estasblished a fact, “all kind of social assets have produced by collective labor”? Later this fact became fundamental of theory of socialism.

In nineteen century, Karl Marx found a contradiction of capitalism, “collective form of labor and individual form of profit, in industry,” and supposed unite of labor class will resolved this contradiction by socialist state.

Now we have history of nine decades of socialism in Russia, China and some other countries. Theory of Karl Marx “dictatorship of labor” proved wrong. An interesting come from history of socialist country what would be remained after demolition of class. Russian and chines text tells us people or working people would be remained.
It means struggle would be continue with in state and society and this struggle not ended by communism as Marx announced.

What I know about socialism. Socialism is a one imagination of humankind. Imagination of problem free society. And imagination comes from religious philosophy of uniform society. Today communal tensions or terror became a serious world problem. And we are witness the American way to solve this problem is not a good way.

I would be happened. I think it depend on our mental status how someone is investigation present past relation. The question of present future relation is second question.

What we obtained to history about socialism. An imagination and some perceptions.
Imagination is of problem free societies and perceptions are:
1) Because natural resources are gifted to human kind so every one have equal right upon nature.
2) Because all kinds of social assets are produced by collective labor so profit will be distributed in within in member those produce the profit.
3) Because man and woman are two forms of human kind so both have equal rights and duties.
4) The kids are part of future generation so they fed up and educated without any kind of discrimination.
5) All man of country would be granted by state for safe living, education, health and employment and every thing which become common in society.

Karl Marx supposed in nineteen centuries capitalism would be replaced by socialism. But Marx failed to understand the process of socialism. Now I want to present my hypothesis. How socialism would be developed. Suppose it the basic quality of social development of labor or labor power or division of labor. Not power of sex as we are thinking in literary way and obtained text from history.
My hypothesis is: as much as lob our diversified society would be complicate in her structure. As much as society would be complicated the professional thinkers would be a need of state to manage the society. As much as scholars involved with state to manage the society a new form of state would be developed. And this form of state would be called socialist state. But I don’t think ever society would be called socialist society. Because society is not an organization. What is society? Society is a total of organization which based on sex, function on theory of division of labor and law of representative. Society is not an organization.

Therefore we can struggle for democratic socialist state only. We can not make problem free society or classless or stateless society: as our forefather was thinking.

Thanks for reading my words.

Would You Like Co-blogging

I am in need of co-blogger/bloggers. Why? I have lot of fresh ideas. But my problem is language. I am not good in English. second problem is I born in a poor family and unable to got higher education and collect sources for research. I want to be a freelance writer particurly philosopher – socialist philosopher.

What I learnt to history? If we would able to analyze the time of last two hundred years we would be able to guess the coming fifty years. What kinds of characteristics in state and society would be occurred in middle of this century?

What is my fundamental understanding of society? Books are record to time only. Therefore no book is holly book for me and no person is divine for me.

Books are valid in a century when it written rest of reading and writing is part of passive thinking.

What is my logic? Society is present and future oriented organization. All kinds of dogmatism, communalism, and capitalism would be replaced by professional state and society. But the struggle within traditional and liberal organization would be exist ever. Because it is a natural quality of society.

What I think about philosophy? Philosophy is a branch of knowledge only. The primary form of knowledge is empirical or literary. The basic question of philosophy for me what is the relationship in literature and philosophy.

Why people in past and present also… tortured to scholars? Is Peoples or innocent and leadership is corrupted. Not, it is not truth. What is truth? not any philosophers tell us we have two kind of knowledge. Contemporary knowledge and scientific or historical knowledge. Till now we don’t know what kind of inter-relation within two form of knowledge.

What is my research project? To develop theory of democratic scientific socialism. And I hope it is possible. But socialism not for me concept of problem free society and exploitation free society. These all are imagination of human kind and Marxists also. Socialism for me a professional state and society, civilization.

What is my standing point. Time and science. I am not influenced by any thinker or any political party. It is my perception I someone wants to work in philosophy. First go in natural sciences. Understand problem of research and logic. After developing methodology we have past to check our theory and the we can interfere in present matter of state and society.

If someone have interest in philosophy and like team work. I would be happy to work with him and her. My mail address is: waterfall691@gmail.com.

KARL MARX AND OUR TIME

150 Years had gone. Karl Marx (1818-1883) is getting rest in his tomb. But influences of his philosophy still remain. 1n 1991, after collapsing of communist rule in USSR and some other countries, a opinion came out in Indian Marxist Thinkers to re read the Marx. In 1999 BBC conducted a survey with in his listener and viewers and declared the philosopher of last millennium. A friend told me earlier the Japanese Communist Party has suggested to their social sciences for re analyzing of Marx’ works. Last days I read an article in a national news paper, writer quoted a German newspaper ‘the sale of ‘Das Capital’ has increased 300 times after American Crisis and World economic crises. Das Capital is also called Capital. It is last great works of Karl Marx. He analyzed, not only capital system of production, answered fundamental question of economies, However introduced New research Methodology and fundamental of philosophy which called historical material ism and Marxism. What is the essence of Marx thinking? He finds out a contradiction of capital production system ‘social form of labor and individual form of profit’. And commented as Feudal system lead by capitalism capital is will be displaced by socialism and communism means stateless and class less society. We don’t now when and how this would be appeared. We have only written material of past of eight thousands to ten thousands years and this material are related to feudal civilization. The last three hundred years of capitalism and only nine decades of history of socialism or we can say feudal socialism. If capitalism will replaced by socialism then we can say this will developed with in some stages. It is not a condition of historical development socialism that the communist parties ruled us then socialism will occurred otherwise there is no socialism. If we think socialism is a civilization then it will develop for hundred to thousand years. In our time there are very light deference in communist parties and other parties in regard of science and particularly scientific philosophy. Marx is not only father of communism he is also a founder of modern philosophy and socialist philosophy. Presently we have not any theory of democratic socialism. A developing trend in Latin American countries influenced by a Canadian philosopher. Who is he and what writes I do not know. The tracing out reason of American crisis and solutions will lead us a new kind of reorganized world. I am sure. Because every crisis have restructured the state and society. And philosophy lead by Karl Marx in coming century too. The Socialism, for me, the trend of socialization of state and democratization of Society, and communist parties and labor class is part of struggle.